Leaves2A.jpg

November 26, 2007

The logical consequence of "being Green" run amok.

" A British woman who had an abortion 10 years ago and was later sterilized did so because she believes pregnancy is bad for the environment, the London Daily Mail reported Sunday.

Toni Vernelli, 35, hopes her actions would ensure her carbon footprint would be kept to a minimum, the Mail reported. The environmental advocate also sees having children as an egotistical act.

"Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," Vernelli told the Mail, adding she believes bringing new life into the world only adds to the problem."

(Source FOXNews.)

But such an attitude is utterly unnecessary.

"The Lord created the heavens.

He is the God who formed the earth and made it.

He did not want it to be empty,

but he wanted life on the earth."

Isaiah 45:18, NCV

Posted by Carl at 02:47 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 07, 2007

Abortion, "Gay Marriage," and the Ten Commandments.

I was stunned to learn today that abortion, "Gay Marriage," and the Ten Commandments are being used to "garner votes." Of course, this was even more stunning, for obvious reasons. But that is beside the point.

What is to the point is this.

That a politician wants to garner any vote, much less my vote, is irrelevant.

That some people--ahem, Mr. James--seem to believe family values are "defined by our families, is absurd. It's like saying that cowboys developed their highly romantic "cowboy-ish philosophies" because they lived out west. And just what the heck are family values anyway? Oh, that's right. Family values is only a buzzword.

"Buzzwords are typically intended to impress one's audience with the pretense of knowledge. For this reason, they are often universal. They typically make sentences difficult to dispute, on account of their cloudy meaning." (Link; Emphasis Mine.)

Well, that clears that up. Let's rephrase a quote from Mr. James now, shall we?

"Our family values (updated text) sasdnvxcuoweyzzdd are defined by our families, not by our political leaders. Unfortunately for all of us, certain politicians have made abortion, gay marriage, and the Ten Commandments political footballs -doing injustice to how we should deal with these issues. These issues are being used to garner votes..." (Link)

Abortion is not a political issue. It is, as I have said, a matter of life and death.

"Gay Marriage" is not a political issue. Like lying, sodomy, homosexuality, or being gay is only an abomination. (Homosexuality=Lev. 18:22; Lying=Prov. 12:22)

The Ten Commandments themselves, are not a political issue. The historicity of their place in American Society is undeniable; although now, it is true, they have lost much of their former significance.

Jobs, education, and security; these things mean nothing without morality. And it is the height of either stupidity, or wickedness to pretend otherwise.

Posted by Carl at 10:21 PM | TrackBack

January 30, 2007

The difference between Militant Islamists and Abortionists.

As a rule, Militant Islamists only murder those who are able to defend themselves. (I say "as a rule," for sometimes they seem inclined break this rule.)

Abortionists, on the other hand, not only condone but actually do murder defenseless children.

For both evils, there is only one answer:

"It's wrong to take a life. It's sin. (That's the bad part.) But Jesus gave his life up willingly to make way for forgiveness for those of us who have taken lives. (That's the good part!)" (Link)

ACTUAL ABORTION VIDEO: (Produced by one of the founders of NARAL, Bernard M. Nathanson, MD.; Images via ultrasound technology.)

Video, Part I
Video, Part II
Video, Part III
Video, Part IV
Video, Part V

Found here and here.

Posted by Carl at 12:03 AM | TrackBack

January 25, 2007

Abortion/Blogs for Choice: Because it shouldn't last for just one day.

I know, I know. The anniversary of Roe-vs-Wade is gone.

"On January 22nd - the 34th anniversary of Roe v. Wade – NARAL Pro-Choice America is asking pro-choice bloggers to raise the profile of reproductive rights issues in the blogosphere and the media, and to let everyone know that a woman's right to choose is nonnegotiable."(Citation Link

But heck, most of those who participated in Blog for Choice Day - January 22, 2007 were just so excited about murdering children that I couldn't help posting some more pics. I mean, seriously, it's only a blob of tissue; right? The fetus I mean. But what is a fetus?

""Fetus: the unborn young of a viviparous vertebrae…" (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition. Copyright 1992) "Viviparous: giving birth to living offspring that develop within the mother's body." (ibid.)" (Found here, in the comments. But let me quote a little more:) Now you stated that "When you abort an embryo, you are eliminating a group of cells that cannot do any of these things. Not a baby, not even a fetus, but something that might turn into a fetus and, eventually, a person…" It is scientifically incorrect to pretend that a fetus is anything but, by definition, unborn. It is inaccurate to describe the fetus as a "group of cells." It is inaccurate to pretend that an embryo, which is an "organism in the early stages of development, especially before it has reached a distinctly recognizable form (ibid.)," is a group of cells. ("Organism: an individual form of life…" ibid.) But finally, while it is scientifically inaccurate to state that a fetus is not a fetus, but is "something that might turn into a fetus," it is false to say that a fetus may "eventually" become a person. It is like saying, "if you fall from an airplane, you might die." For your statement implies a strong possibility that the fetus will not become a person. Scientifically speaking, that implication is absurd." (Same link as above.)

Which is, of course, quite true. Anyways, in honor--or is it horror?--of the anniversary of Roe--vs--Wade, here's something to think about. (Pictures from here.)


10weekold.JPG

Yep. Just a blob of tissue.

baby2.jpg

Shoooot, that ain't no baby!

BTW, abortion isn't wrong because it's murder; even though it is murder. Abortion is wrong for the same reason murder is wrong: Abortion destroys a being who was made in the image of God.

Continue reading "Abortion/Blogs for Choice: Because it shouldn't last for just one day."

Posted by Carl at 10:53 PM | TrackBack

January 23, 2007

Late entry: "Blog-for-Choice-Day."


Blog for Choice Day - January 22, 2007

abort003.jpg
(Here, and here.)

Posted by Carl at 01:14 AM | TrackBack

January 22, 2007

Oops, sorry. Just one more about Abortion.

Isn't this just sick? Perversely ironic, if you prefer.

"Happy Birthday, Roe v. Wade" (Found here, and here, Emphasis Mine.)

Posted by Carl at 10:52 PM | TrackBack

47,282,923 redux, deux.

"Why am I pro-choice? It's a simple thing." I simply disagree that having sex causes babies; or that having sex is a choice for that matter. "I would like to see the number of abortions performed in this country decrease", but I know this utopia of mine is impossible until we call abortion what it really is: murder; but hey, that's just me. Some goobs think that the "(proven) best way to do that is with education, birth control, and supporting every citizen with access to health care. Other people are weighing in, here, here, and in a gagillion other places. Check it out and give it some thought...real, investigave thought." Actual Quote

Posted by Carl at 10:35 PM | TrackBack

47,282,923 redux.

...couldn't of said it any better:

"It's wrong to take a life. It's sin. (That's the bad part.) But Jesus gave his life up willingly to make way for forgiveness for those of us who have taken lives. (That's the good part!)"

Posted by Carl at 10:20 PM | TrackBack